Fixes 51 bugs discovered via comparison with `actions/runner`. Every fix has test coverage.
### Secrets
- A short secret registered no shifted-base64 form, so `base64("user:$TOKEN")` printed in the clear
- Encoded forms came only from the whole trimmed value, missing padded and per-line spellings
- Masks split only on `\n`, so `::add-mask::a%0Db` registered neither half
- Adds XML, expression-string and quote-trimming encoders
### Workflow commands
- Split at the last `::` or `]` rather than the first, so `::add-mask::a::b` registered no mask
- A command on the last line without a newline was ignored, and `::ADD-MASK::` did nothing
- `##[...]` did not decode `%3B`/`%5D`, properties lost anything after a second `=`
- `$GITHUB_ENV` and `::set-env::` now refuse `NODE_OPTIONS`
### Status
- `continue-on-error` reported failed, a cancelled job reported success, an `if:` error reported cancelled
- File commands ran after `continue-on-error`, failing the job while the step stayed green
- A bad job output aborted the whole run instead of that job
### Steps and actions
- `${{ matrix.* }}` and `${{ strategy.* }}` were empty inside composite actions
- Composite inputs leaked into nested actions as `INPUT_*`, `with:` matched case-sensitively, `pre` failures were dropped
- Docker actions dropped `runs.env` when the caller passed `with: args:`, and caller `args`/`entrypoint` beat the manifest
- An implicit shell ran with `pipefail`, a `shell:` without `{0}` passed without running
- `container.env` overrode job env and every `$GITHUB_ENV` write, heredocs lost leading blank lines, `$GITHUB_PATH` was not BOM-decoded
Written by Claude Opus 5.
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/1194
Reviewed-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Revert #1136 and use actionslib instead.
revert chore: bump the module path to `/v3`, take the version from the VCS stamp (#1136)
gitea can not consume the runner's api by version while it's version mismatches the module version:
```
go: gitea.com/gitea/runner@v3.0.1: invalid version: module contains a go.mod file,
so module path must match major version ("gitea.com/gitea/runner/v3")
```
Fix that by bumping the module version now. The existing `v3.0.0` and `v3.0.1` tags stay unusable, so a new tag is needed after this lands.
Also drop the version `-X` linker flags, which would otherwise have to repeat the new path in both `Makefile` and `.goreleaser.yaml`, where a stale path makes injection silently no-op. Go has recorded the module version in the build info since 1.24, so `Version()` reads it from there, keeping the variable as an override for builds without a VCS stamp.
That part started as https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/1137 but belongs here: the stamp resolves against the tags that are legal for the module path, so without the `/v3` bump it would report `v1.0.9-0.<ts>-<sha>`. Since `release-nightly.yml` triggers on every push to `main`, splitting them would publish a nightly with a `v1` version.
---------
Co-authored-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/1136
Reviewed-by: techknowlogick <9+techknowlogick@noreply.gitea.com>
Reviewed-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/1148
Reviewed-by: Zettat123 <39446+zettat123@noreply.gitea.com>
gitea can not consume the runner's api by version while it's version mismatches the module version:
```
go: gitea.com/gitea/runner@v3.0.1: invalid version: module contains a go.mod file,
so module path must match major version ("gitea.com/gitea/runner/v3")
```
Fix that by bumping the module version now. The existing `v3.0.0` and `v3.0.1` tags stay unusable, so a new tag is needed after this lands.
Also drop the version `-X` linker flags, which would otherwise have to repeat the new path in both `Makefile` and `.goreleaser.yaml`, where a stale path makes injection silently no-op. Go has recorded the module version in the build info since 1.24, so `Version()` reads it from there, keeping the variable as an override for builds without a VCS stamp.
That part started as https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/1137 but belongs here: the stamp resolves against the tags that are legal for the module path, so without the `/v3` bump it would report `v1.0.9-0.<ts>-<sha>`. Since `release-nightly.yml` triggers on every push to `main`, splitting them would publish a nightly with a `v1` version.
---------
Co-authored-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/1136
Reviewed-by: techknowlogick <9+techknowlogick@noreply.gitea.com>
Reviewed-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
`::set-env::` and `::add-path::` let a step rewrite the environment of every later step from its own output, which the runner honoured silently. They are now refused, as GitHub has done since 2020, and `ACTIONS_ALLOW_UNSECURE_COMMANDS` opts back in per step or job. Support for that variable is new here too, and is the only opt-in, matching GitHub rather than adding a runner config key on top.
Annotations keep their source location: Gitea has no annotation store and its web UI strips command properties, so `::error file=main.go,line=12::msg` is rendered as `::error::main.go:12: msg`.
`DEVELOPMENT.md` writes down the log line encoding rules this relies on.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/1109
Reviewed-by: silverwind <2021+silverwind@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
Adds `runner.hooks.job_started` and `runner.hooks.job_completed`: operator scripts that run inside the job environment, before the job's first step and after its last one.
```yaml
runner:
hooks:
job_started: /hooks/started.sh
job_completed: /hooks/completed.sh
```
Equivalent to GitHub's `ACTIONS_RUNNER_HOOK_JOB_STARTED` / `ACTIONS_RUNNER_HOOK_JOB_COMPLETED`, which are read when unset: output is scanned for workflow commands, `$GITHUB_ENV` and `$GITHUB_PATH` are read back, and a non-zero exit fails the job.
Fixes: https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/issues/779
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/1111
Reviewed-by: silverwind <2021+silverwind@noreply.gitea.com>
silverwind
Renovate Bot
Lunny Xiao
bircni